Waterway, Eleanor Dark

Image result for eleanor dark waterway

Waterway (1938) is a far more significant work than I realised when my brother (B2) gave it to me to read a few months ago, and I’m going to go into some background to try and explain why I think so.

Before I go on though, about halfway through reading this novel I happened to glance at the back cover (of the edition pictured above) and it completely gives away the novel’s ending. Why a publisher would do that I don’t know, but it spoiled my reading of the book, and I can only advise you to resolutely hold the book face UP.

Eleanor Dark (1901-1985) was one of the women writers who dominated my Australian Gen 3 period – from the end of WWI to the 1950s, a period marked for women writers at least by a concentration on social (and in some cases socialist) realism. Socialism was an important influence during this period, though of course much less so after 1956. KS Prichard was a Communist; as was Jean Devanney; Christina Stead was, though she wasn’t a party member; Kylie Tennant was briefly a party member; there is evidence Miles Franklin hovered between socialism and communism. I’m not sure about Dark, but her husband was socialist and active on the left of the Labor Party.

Prior to my reading this book, Dark’s importance, to me, was her Timeless Land trilogy (1941, 1948, 1953) which imagined for the first time white settlement from the point of view of the displaced Aborigines. The only other of her works I remember reading is Return to Coolamai (1936) and it seemed to me her interest there was in middle class character and interaction. But I can see now her importance in the introduction of Modernism.

Waterway was Dark’s fifth novel. No.s 2 and 3, Prelude to Christopher and Return to Coolamai were both winners of the ALS Gold Medal. Wikileaks says (today anyway) of Prelude that “the storyline is nonlinear and of interest to those interested in the establishment of modernism in the arts in Australia.” It is interesting to guess what books/writers Dark might have been influenced by. Here are some landmarks –

Joseph Furphy, Such is Life (1903)
DH Lawrence, Sons and Lovers (1913)
James Joyce, Ulysses (1922)
Eleanor Dark, Slow Dawning (1932)
Christina Stead, Seven Poor Men of Sydney (1934)
Patrick White, Happy Valley (1939)

So Dark and Stead were almost exact contemporaries, with Dark the first to be published, by a couple of years. Stead had the advantage of being in Paris in the early 30s in the circle around Sylvia Beach who published Ulysses, while Dark remained in Sydney. And I think Stead gradually became the more polished writer. Interestingly, both Seven Poor Men of Sydney and Waterway are set in Watsons Bay, just inside the Heads, on the south side of Sydney Harbour.

Like Ulysses, Waterway is one day in one city, but from the point of view of an omniscient observer relating the conversations, arguments, thought processes of 16 people from half a dozen houses in this one waterside suburb, as they bump into each other, in the street, in the water and on the ferry to and from the city.

Dark divides her protagonists into thoughtlessly wealthy and philosophers (with not much in between). The philosophers are led by Professor Channon who has two beautiful, intelligent daughters – Winifred unhappily married to rich Arthur Sellman and Lesley, single, who has just become the lover of Sim, the carefree, handsome younger son of another wealthy family, the Hegarty’s. Winifred has a blind daughter, 6 and is in love with her widower next door neighbour Ian who has sons aged 7 and 8. Arthur’s sister Lorna, also beautiful, but vain and thoughtless with it, is determined to marry Sim. Then there are the doctor and his artist wife, Lois; Roger who publishes a failing literary newsletter; and finally Jack, unemployed, living in a shack on the waterline amongst the fishermen, strong, angry and incoherent.

Dark’s philosophy, which is expressed by a number of her protagonists, basically seems to be Christianity without the religion –

“Hang it all, if you gave away every bean you possessed tomorrow, it wouldn’t be the little bit of ‘philanthropy’ that mattered, it would be the freeing of yourself [from possessions].” Roger to Sim.

It’s summer, the day is fine, hot. Those who can, start the morning, or in Lesley and Sim’s case, finish the night before, with a swim in the cove. The workers catch the ferry or drive into town. Winifred and Ian have vowed to stop meeting but manage to be on the beach at the same time so his boys can take her daughter for a swim. Arthur of course is angry and broods that the wife to whom he gives everything wants nothing except divorce.

The afternoon is to see the society wedding of Sim’s older brother and that, though unimportant to all the protagonists, is a focus for much of their activity. Jack falls and damages his hand, ends up in a mob of unemployed which gravitates towards the crowd watching the wedding; the kids go to the zoo; the artist has some paintings in an exhibition; one way or another most of them end up in town to come home on the 10 to 5 ferry.

There’s some excitement and the day draws to a close. It’s very well done and we the reader are involved in the ebb and flow of their thoughts. Sue (WG) of course will ask me how I can allow Dark to write the thoughts of men. Good question Sue. To a large extent the men are stereotypes, particularly Jack, I don’t think Dark is very familiar with the working class. The women are much more interesting. Winifred, Lesley, Lois and even Sim’s mother, Lady Hegarty are thoughtful and intelligent, though none of them is independent in the sense of wishing for a life without a husband.

Dark foreshadows her later work, which may have been inspired by a feeling that the Harbour is a living, breathing organism with a life independent of the white society that has so recently perched around its shores –

And when the invaders landed they felt a soil beneath their feet whose very texture was alien; a hard earth, which smelt not of grass and flowers and hay, the reassuring familiar odours of man’s long habitation, but strangely of an age-old solitude.

Lesley, who is probably the closest to being Dark herself, as the doctor seems based on her (Dark’s) husband, writes stories set in the earliest days of white settlement

By now, fed by necessary research, her mental picture of the city in its infancy had grown so familiar to her that she had often felt when she stepped out again from this quiet room into the daylight … surprised to find it no longer that … straggling settlement of a handful of colonists.

I haven’t really made the case for just how good the writing is, the long streams of consciousness as one protagonist or another reflects. The author herself notes one of her influences –

She thought, “I’m going all D.H. Lawrence! I suppose you have to go through this before you realise how accurately he paints – one side of the picture!” Lesley.

If you like to think about writing, and about Australian writing in particular, then this is a book you should consider. I think Aust.Lit. came of age in the 1930s and it was the women, and I guess Xavier Herbert, who were responsible, and who in a large way formed the base built on by Patrick White.


Eleanor Dark, Waterway, first pub. 1938. My copy Imprint 1990 with Introduction by Drusilla Modjeska

see also:
Meg Brayshaw, The Quiet Brilliance of Eleanor Dark, AWWC (here)
Chris Williams, Christina Stead: A Life of Letters (here)
Sylvia Beach, Ulysses in Paris (here)

Australian Women Writers Gen 3 Week will be in the second week of January 2020 (and there will probably be a Part II in the corresponding week of the following year).

21 thoughts on “Waterway, Eleanor Dark

  1. I am definitely someone who likes to “think about writing,” but steam-of-conscious writing as always been in opposite corners from me. I do like how you focus on the way an author represents characters’ genders in comparison to the writer’s own. I’ve been asking myself what the books I read say about women, or how they represent women, and I enjoy reading something similar on another person’s blog.


    • Stream of consciousness has been done to death these days but Dark was writing when modernism was new and I can imagine her excitement at having these new ideas to try out, and she does it quite well, without aping Joyce, and in clear contrast to her fellows who were nearly all straight story tellers.

      Whispering Gums is not letting me get away with much on the subject of who should speak for women, and it is having the effect of making me think more about the opinions I express.

      Liked by 1 person

      • But I struggle to get through James Joyce and Virginia Woolfe. It’s just not my jam — possibly because the topic is so unrelated to me that I struggle to care. Should he have sex, how will she get her party together on time, etc.

        Good job, Sue! I love when we book bloggers push each other to think harder. Those comment threads can get quite long.


      • Joyce and I think Woolfe experimented with free association, word play. Which makes them very difficult to read if you can’t get into the flow of words. Finnegans Wake is all wordplay and entirely beyond me. You wrote one time I think about preferring the writing to follow the rules and I think modernism was about breaking or at least stretching them.


  2. Well, hello! I have no idea why, but WordPress failed to notify me about this post.
    (I have been having ‘issues’ with my email ever since the last auto-update and have just spent two hours on the phone getting tech support. Fingers crossed it is fixed now).
    I haven’t read enough of Dark, only No Barrier and Lantana Lane, so I think I’ll chase up some for AWW Gen 3.
    I love an excuse to go shopping!


    • It’s never too early to start reading for Gen 3, though I am currently working on my second review for Indig.Lit. Week, and then I’d better read another David Ireland. I’m often tempted to use one of my ‘spare’ email accounts to register as one of my own readers so I can be sure WordPress is sending out notifications but I never seem to get round to it. mmm… I could be an agent provocateur in the comment stream (trickle).


  3. It does seem a very strange thing for a publisher to do. Maybe it was something publishers did in the decade when this edition was published. I don’t think I’ve seen it happening now….


    • When I googled covers, one of them pictured the climax as well. The day is otherwise so ordinary that even the idea of a climax spoils it a bit. Obviously the publishers think differently. I don’t read blurbs ordinarily because I like to learn things in the order the author intended.


      • I skim a blurb because that way I avoid buying books I know I will dislike (anything that has a phrase like ‘their lives were changed forever” immediately gets rejected)


      • Yes, I admit I mostly choose audiobooks (from the library) the same way. But books I buy are nearly always on the basis of the author, not the story.


  4. I enjoyed your review and your extension of the reading into who the author might have been reading/influenced by at the time. Thank you for sharing your additional knowledge around this, it enriches the review tremendously.


  5. I’m so sorry I didn’t reply to this earlier. It arrived two days before my Mum’s 90th which we were having at our place, and family, including grandchild were descending. Clearly when it was all over, I didn’t go back far enough to check my favourite bloggers. I was pretty exhausted (albeit was a wonderful occasion).

    Im glad you asked my question and answered it. How very efficient of you! Haha.

    As you may know, I’ve referenced this review in my latest AWW Challenge report – which is how I suddenly discovered this post. How many others have I missed. Not many I hope! This sounds really interesting – content-wise and technique/style-wise.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s